Have you had a professional energy assessment?
No votes yet. Yours will be the first. · saved on this device
Loading...

Home Energy Scope · Reviews
This site does not publish ratings or testimonials. This page explains how to read reviews of energy auditors, insulation contractors, window installers and solar companies elsewhere: what a genuine review describes, which patterns signal trouble, and how to verify credentials, rebate enrollment and test results that no review can replace.
Energy work is judged twice: on the day the crew leaves, when the attic looks full and the windows look new, and a year later, when the bills and the comfort either changed or did not. Most reviews are written on day one. This Old House's 2025 survey found 89% of homeowners reported lower bills after window replacement, but the useful review is the one that says by how much and whether the room stopped sweating.
What follows is a reading method rather than a verdict on any company, plus the verification steps that matter more than a star count in this niche: credentials, test results and rebate enrollment.
Numbers and specifics. A good audit review mentions the blower door result, the thermal images and whether the report prioritized measures. A good insulation review mentions the before-and-after leakage numbers, the depth markers in the attic, and whether the crew sealed before blowing. A good window review describes the flashing, the trim restoration and how the sashes operate a year on. A good solar review compares actual production to the estimate. 'Great crew, very professional' tells you nothing about any of that.
Look for the hitch. Pearl's registry analysis found air leakage problems in ~90% of homes, and real jobs turn up surprises: knob-and-tube wiring, a rotted sill, a panel that needed upgrading. Honest reviews of good contractors describe the surprise and how it was handled. A company with only flawless reviews is either filtering them or has not done complex work.
Homeowner polls
No votes yet. Yours will be the first. · saved on this device
Service guideHome Energy AuditsA home energy audit connects comfort complaints and utility bills to the measured condition of the house through a blower door test, thermal imaging, duct leakage testing and combustion-safety checks, then delivers written, prioritized recommendations.
Service guideInsulation & Air SealingAir sealing closes the gaps that move air through the attic plane, rim joist and penetrations; insulation slows heat conduction through the assemblies around them.
Service guideWindow & Door ReplacementWindow and door replacement addresses openings with a defined problem: damage, failed seals, poor operation, drafts, single-pane glass in a cold climate, or a door that leaks and does not latch.
Tell us the size, the condition of what is there now, and what you want to change. Home Energy Scope passes your request to independent local professionals, who reply with written, no-obligation estimates. The service is free to use.
Reviews that quote a savings percentage the contractor promised are a warning, because savings depend on the house and no honest pro promises a number without assumptions. Reviews that mention a rebate or tax credit that turned out not to apply point to a sales process that counted incentives before confirming them; the federal credits ended for property placed in service after December 31, 2025, and any 2026 review still citing them describes a stale pitch. Reviews describing a test that was skipped, a report never delivered, or a system producing far below estimate are the substantive complaints.
In negative reviews, read the company's reply. A specific, calm explanation of what happened is informative; an attack on the reviewer or silence across many complaints is the pattern to avoid. Cluster timing, repeated marketing phrases and reviews praising the salesperson rather than the result are the usual signs of manufactured feedback. Filter by scope as well: Fixr's national average energy audit costs $250 while HomeAdvisor's average spray foam project runs $2,888, so a contractor's recent reviews often mix large retrofits with small jobs.

For auditors, check BPI Building Analyst or RESNET HERS Rater credentials with the certifying body. For insulation, window and solar contractors, check state licensing and ask for a certificate of insurance naming you. Ask which rebate programs the contractor is enrolled in, because many require a participating contractor and pre-approval. For solar, confirm NABCEP certification for the lead installer and ask for the production estimates and actual output from two past projects. For any envelope work, ask whether a blower door test-out is standard.
Then read the proposal against the four questions on every service page: measured problem, moisture and safety handling, savings assumptions, confirmed incentives. A contractor whose reviews are good and whose proposal answers those in writing is the combination to look for. Ask about phasing too, since Fixr puts average window replacement at $800/window and whole-house jobs add up fast. The services hub shows what a complete proposal contains for each scope, and the contact page explains how to request one.
Ask what changed a year later: the bills, the cold room, the condensation. Ask whether they received the report or test numbers in writing. Ask whether the rebate arrived as promised. Ask what surprised the crew and how it was handled. For solar, ask what the system actually produced against the estimate. Ten minutes on the phone covers the part of the job that day-one reviews cannot see. NAR found 37% of Realtors rank windows, doors and siding as the most valued green features, so ask too whether the reference kept the specifications for resale.
Because ratings are easy to manufacture and hard to verify, and a matching resource that rated the people it introduced would have an obvious conflict. This page instead explains how to read reviews elsewhere and how to verify credentials, rebate enrollment and test results. Those checks take an hour and tell you more than a star count.
As a list of the kinds of projects they do, yes. As evidence of quality, no, because they are selected by the company and rarely dated. Use them to confirm the contractor handles your scope, then read third-party reviews and call references for the year-later story.
Little on its own, unless it describes a structural problem such as a skipped combustion-safety test, a report never delivered, or a rebate counted that did not exist. Scheduling complaints and delayed materials happen to everyone. Read the reply and look for the same issue elsewhere. Patterns matter; isolated events do not.
Independent auditors often work quietly with a few dozen clients a year, so a thin review history is not disqualifying. Lean on credentials, a sample report with the client's details removed, and references. The quality of a sample report, with measured numbers and prioritized measures, tells you more than any review.
It can work, with safeguards: before-and-after blower door numbers, a combustion-safety result, and a written note on findings they do not address. The risk is a diagnosis that always finds their product. If the budget allows, an independent audit followed by competitive bids removes the conflict entirely.
Ask for the production estimate and the actual monitored output from two past installations of similar size and orientation, then compare. Run your own estimate with NREL's PVWatts using your roof's azimuth and tilt. A company whose past systems produce within 5 to 10% of estimate is being straight with you; a pattern of shortfalls is the warning.
Write a review a season or a year later that includes numbers: the blower door result, the change in bills, the production versus estimate, whether the rebate arrived. Describe any surprise and how it was handled. That is the review this page tells people to look for, and it helps a good contractor more than a compliment.
Solar panel installation covers the roof and shading assessment, equipment selection, electrical and structural permits, utility interconnection and the production and financial assumptions in the proposal.